Day 3: Score Yourself Across All Six Games

Instructions

Part 1: Self-assessment

For each game (G1–G6), rate yourself on:

• Capability (0–10): How good are you at playing this game?
• Interest (0–10): How much do you enjoy this game?
• Current activity (0–10): How much are you currently playing this game?
• Natural fit (0–10): How naturally does this game come to you?

Create a table with all 6 games and all 4 dimensions.

Part 2: Evidence

For each game where you scored >5 on capability, provide:

• Specific example of you playing this game well
• Observable outcome (what happened because you played?)
• Who could verify your performance?
• What artifact exists as proof?

Part 3: Gap analysis

• Where is your capability higher than your current activity? (Underutilized games)
• Where is your current activity higher than your capability? (Wasted effort)
• Where is interest high but capability low? (Development opportunity)
• Which game has the highest combined score across all dimensions? (Primary game)

Part 4: The hard truth

• If you could only play ONE game for the next 6 months, which would it be?
• What would you have to stop doing?
• Who in your current network is playing this game at a high level?
• What would it take to actually commit to playing this game well?

Submission format

• Structured document with scores table
• Evidence for all high-capability claims
• Complete gap analysis
• Part 4 must show real thinking about commitment, not just "I'd like to do X"

What we're looking for

• Honest self-assessment, not aspirational claims
• Actual evidence of capability (not just interest)
• Recognition of where effort is misaligned with capability
• Beginning to see which game you should actually be playing
• Willingness to consider stopping activities that don't serve your primary game